Paper report · Chemistry
Marked byMiss U.Qualified science teacher
This paper58/80
Practice comparisonNot an official grade or prediction
7MonPro practice grade7School target
Teacher's read“Amara is close to her target. Mole calculations are the difference.”Miss U.
For your child
On trackMostly secureWorking onSome marks lostNeeds focusMany marks lost
Marks by topic
Atomic structure11/12On track
Bonding & structure14/18On track
Chemical changes12/16On track
Energy changes7/8On track
Rates & equilibrium9/14Working on
Quantitative chemistry5/12Needs focus
What the marking showed
What worked. Where marks were lost.
What went well
Marks secured
Bonding is secure.
Ionic, covalent and metallic bonding were explained correctly.
Equations are accurate.
Symbol equations and state symbols were handled well.
Where marks were lost
Fix these first
Mole calculations.
Five marks were lost across Q14 and Q18 by not converting mass to moles first.
Seen in Q14 · Q18Units.
The method in Q9 was correct, but the final unit was missing.
In fullMiss U.
Teacher's note
Amara understands most of the chemistry in this paper and explains ideas clearly. Her equations and bonding answers were particularly secure. Most of the lost marks came from one repeated step: converting mass to moles before continuing a calculation. The chemistry is there; the calculation order needs more attention. Q14 and Q18 show this most clearly. Q9 was also correct apart from the missing unit.